After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures around Europe, fresh technologies are actually reviving these systems. Coming from lie recognition tools examined at the boundary to a system for validating documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of technologies is being found in asylum applications. This article explores Visit Website just how these solutions have reshaped the ways asylum procedures happen to be conducted. It reveals just how asylum seekers happen to be transformed into required hindered techno-users: They are asked to comply with a series of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with unpredictable tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This obstructs their very own capacity to navigate these systems and to follow their right for coverage.
It also shows how these types of technologies happen to be embedded in refugee governance: They aid the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of distributed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity simply by hindering them from getting at the channels of protection. It further states that studies of securitization and victimization should be along with an insight in the disciplinary mechanisms of those technologies, by which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects just who are regimented by their reliability on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal expertise, the article argues that these technologies have an inherent obstructiveness. There is a double impact: when they assist to expedite the asylum procedure, they also help to make it difficult with respect to refugees to navigate these kinds of systems. They may be positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes these people vulnerable to illegitimate decisions manufactured by non-governmental stars, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their instances. Moreover, they will pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in incorrect or discriminatory outcomes.